nanog mailing list archives
Re: 2511 line break
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:34:34 +0300
Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
There is also an infinite supply of idiots and mediocre network engineers. Breaking up stuff is easier than making it robust which is the reason why only protocols that are really resistant to abuse prevail.Yes, it *could* make connecting to shoot that port that's spewing ICMP at line rates a bit challenging, but you knew that when you chose the queueing algorithm, right?
Pete
Current thread:
- Re: 2511 line break, (continued)
- Re: 2511 line break Robert Bonomi (Jul 26)
- Re: 2511 line break Ingo Flaschberger (Jul 26)
- Re: 2511 line break Joe Abley (Jul 26)
- Re: 2511 line break Randy Bush (Jul 26)
- Re: 2511 line break Ricardo "Rick" Gonzalez (Jul 26)
- Re: 2511 line break Joe Abley (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break Randy Bush (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break Ingo Flaschberger (Jul 26)
- Re: 2511 line break Robert Bonomi (Jul 26)
- Re: 2511 line break Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break Petri Helenius (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break Petri Helenius (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break Randy Bush (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break Niels Bakker (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break Richard Welty (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break Jeff Shultz (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break jdisher (Jul 29)
- RE: 2511 line break Joel Jaeggli (Jul 27)