nanog mailing list archives
Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner () nic-naa net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 02:44:35 +0000
Richard wrote:
... the return path provides ...
This was where I ended up also. As Barry and others have discussed on the asrg, the write-side is throw-away assets. The "return path" is where the persistence of the names used is greater and the value to the scheme is realized. and Randy wrote:
all they need to do is register foo.bar with delegation to their dns servers, and change a third level domain name at will.
Yeah. But that's where registrars and registries can interpose on the scheme. The static 2LD with a twinkling constelation of 3LDs is still vulnerable. A run of twinkling 2LDs is harder for registrars and/or registries to break, cross registries and registrars. There may be fewer points of failure in the NS-set used for a particular campaign. Eric
Current thread:
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net, (continued)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Chris Brenton (Jul 22)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Randy Bush (Jul 22)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Daniel Karrenberg (Jul 22)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Richard Cox (Jul 22)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Randy Bush (Jul 22)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Richard Cox (Jul 23)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Christian Kuhtz (Jul 23)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Daniel Senie (Jul 23)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jul 23)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net william(at)elan.net (Jul 22)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jul 22)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Petri Helenius (Jul 23)
- Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net Paul Vixie (Jul 23)