nanog mailing list archives
Re: Impending (mydoom) DOS attack
From: "Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr." <larrysheldon () cox net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:51:33 -0600
Leo Bicknell wrote:
Bruce Perens has said it far better than I ever could at http://perens.com/SCO/DOS/. Please read what he has to say. We (Open Source, ISPs, etc) must, MUST, come to SCO's defense on this one. I am doing what I can with my employer to do just that.
I agree both with Mr. Bicknell, and with Mr. Perens for the reasons given. I believe further that condemning this attack and doing what we can to thwart it are simply the right things to do.
Allowing attacks like this to succeed, either directly or indirectly is far more harmful than allowing SCO to stay online. We cannot condone these actions for any reason, the end does not justify the means in the case of worms.
Current thread:
- Impending (mydoom) DOS attack bcm (Jan 30)
- Re: Impending (mydoom) DOS attack Chris Behrens (Jan 30)
- Re: Impending (mydoom) DOS attack Leo Bicknell (Jan 30)
- Lack of Info (was Re: Impending (mydoom) DOS attack) Sean Donelan (Jan 30)
- Re: Impending (mydoom) DOS attack Mike Tancsa (Jan 30)
- MyDoom statistics (was Re: Impending (mydoom) DOS attack) Sean Donelan (Jan 30)
- Re: Impending (mydoom) DOS attack Donovan Hill (Jan 30)
- Re: Impending (mydoom) DOS attack Leo Bicknell (Jan 30)
- Re: Impending (mydoom) DOS attack Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Jan 30)
- Re: Impending (mydoom) DOS attack Donovan Hill (Jan 30)
- Re: Impending (mydoom) DOS attack Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 31)
- Re: Impending (mydoom) DOS attack Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 31)
- Re: Impending (mydoom) DOS attack Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Jan 31)
- Re: Impending (mydoom) DOS attack Leo Bicknell (Jan 30)
- Re: Impending (mydoom) DOS attack Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Fw: Impending (mydoom) DOS attack james (Jan 30)