nanog mailing list archives

Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone?

From: Tomas Lund <tlund () swip net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 02:41:26 +0100 (CET)


On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Brett Watson wrote:

I was just having a hard time believing AT&T was leaking 10/8 and that
any other large provider was accepting it so wanted to verify.


Wasn't it established that they did infact not leak it but just routed it
inside their own network?

//tlund

Current thread:

Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone?, (continued)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? ken emery (Jan 22)
  - Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Stephen Fisher (Jan 22)
    - Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Chris Adams (Jan 22)
    - Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Brett Watson (Jan 22)
    - Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Matt Levine (Jan 22)
    - Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? ken emery (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Matthew S. Hallacy (Jan 22)
  - Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? ken emery (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Sean Donelan (Jan 22)
  - Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Brett Watson (Jan 22)
    - Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Tomas Lund (Jan 22)
    - Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Brett Watson (Jan 22)
    - Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? ken emery (Jan 22)