Re: Upcoming change to SOA values in .com and .net zones

[Frank Louwers <frank () openminds be>]

On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:17:58PM +0000, Richard D G Cox wrote:
> | but isn't 2004010101 (today) > 1076370400 (9 Feb 2004)?
>
> Nope!
>
> > > The new format will be the UTC time at the moment of zone generation
> > > encoded as the number of seconds since the UNIX epoch.
>    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> ... and not as YYYYMMDDHHMMSS or any contracted version thereof!

Don't they use YYYYMMDDNN now? So today's version whould be 2004010801.
AFAIK, 1076370400 is actually "less" then 2004010801...

I know there are ways to "trick" nameservers in believing less is more,
but that requires at least 2 changes, and I don't know if that is
actually RFC-compliant behaviour...

Kind Regards,
Frank Louwers

-- 
Openminds bvba                www.openminds.be
Tweebruggenstraat 16  -  9000 Gent  -  Belgium