nanog mailing list archives
RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my!
From: "Jason Frisvold" <friz () corp ptd net>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:01:20 -0500
Ours dropped about 70% ... And it's been steady ever since.. we've added a large number of modems since that time as well... Look into 'no cable-arp' as well ... Basically, it prevents arp broadcasts and that also had a major impact on the cpu utilization of our CMTS's.. Jason Frisvold Backbone Engineering Supervisor Penteledata
-----Original Message----- From: Tarko Tikan [mailto:tarko () lanparty ee] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 2:55 PM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! hello!The G1 processors, so far, have proven to be wonderful... We only
have
experience with them running in the 7200 uBR chassis, but they've
shown
a huge reduction in CPU utilization...what is huge reduction for you? we upgraded from npe-400 to npe-g1 on ubr7200 and processor usage decreased 20-30%. And we are pushing about 100Mbps traffic from GigE to cable and about 20-30Mbps from cable to
GigE.
-- tarko
Current thread:
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my!, (continued)
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Michel Py (Jan 07)
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! jlewis (Jan 07)
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Jason Frisvold (Jan 07)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Tarko Tikan (Jan 07)
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Christopher J. Wolff (Jan 07)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Tarko Tikan (Jan 07)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Jesper Skriver (Jan 12)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 12)
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! David Schwartz (Jan 13)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Tarko Tikan (Jan 07)
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Michel Py (Jan 07)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! JC Dill (Jan 08)