nanog mailing list archives
Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad?
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () ttec com>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 10:49:34 -0500
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Joe Maimon [2/3/2004 8:43 PM] :What you are saying is that every mailhost on the Internet should run up to date and efficient virus scanning? Pattern matching and header filtering? Should the executable attachmant become outlawed on the Internet? Recognize when a "to be bounced email" is a spoof and discard the DSN?You are going to an extreme there I'm afraid ... I do agree that exaggeration helps stress a point, but ...
<snip> What I was really trying to say is that it is far from a simple topic.
Current thread:
- antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 03)
- Message not available
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Daniel Senie (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Joe Maimon (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Joe Maimon (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Daniel Senie (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Daniel Senie (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Joe Maimon (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Adi Linden (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? JC Dill (Feb 03)