Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks

[Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>]

Daniel Karrenberg wrote:

> Correct, but only in the absence of more specific filtering.
> the problem this proposal aims to correct is the increasing number of
> false positives caused by the apparent *serious* lag in relatively
> static bogon filtering. 
>
>  
Do you think this can be fixed after vendors started putting in bogon 
lists into their SME and SOHO products and let loose the consultants 
promoting them as "plug-and-play security for small office"? There is 
probably hundreds of  thousands of these devices out there.

Pete