nanog mailing list archives
Re: routing invalid IP addresses
From: "Geo." <georger () getinfo net>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 08:41:13 -0500
traceroute to 248.245.255.191, that's what made me think it was invalid. I did get the answer, I was being stupid and trying to use IP route instead of an acl. Thanks to everyone who replied, even the "nooooooooo" guy. Geo. (I'm not the cisco guy, I was just the only one working last night) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Woodcock" <woody () pch net> To: "Geo." <georger () getinfo net> Cc: <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 8:03 AM Subject: Re: routing invalid IP addresses
> x.x.255.x isn't a valid IP address > Clue me in? Clue: it's a valid address. -Bill
Current thread:
- Verizon clients DOS own site? Elkind_Rob (Feb 19)
- Re: Verizon clients DOS own site? William Warren (Feb 19)
- Re: Verizon clients DOS own site? Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Feb 19)
- RE: Verizon clients DOS own site? Wayne Gustavus (nanog) (Feb 20)
- Re: Verizon clients DOS own site? William Warren (Feb 20)
- routing invalid IP addresses Geo. (Feb 21)
- Re: routing invalid IP addresses Bill Woodcock (Feb 21)
- Re: routing invalid IP addresses Geo. (Feb 21)
- Re: routing invalid IP addresses Christopher X. Candreva (Feb 21)
- RE: routing invalid IP addresses Geo. (Feb 21)
- Re: routing invalid IP addresses Brian Knoblauch (Feb 21)
- Re: routing invalid IP addresses Geo. (Feb 21)
- Re: Verizon clients DOS own site? William Warren (Feb 20)
- Re: Verizon clients DOS own site? William Warren (Feb 19)
- Re: routing invalid IP addresses Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 21)
- Re: routing invalid IP addresses bill (Feb 21)
- Re: routing invalid IP addresses Richard A Steenbergen (Feb 21)
- Re: routing invalid IP addresses Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Feb 21)
- Re: routing invalid IP addresses Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 21)
- Re: routing invalid IP addresses Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Feb 21)