nanog mailing list archives
Re: Unbelievable Spam.
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 02 Feb 2004 21:42:03 +0000
ejay.hire () isdn net ("Ejay Hire") writes:
It's just wrong in my opinion, and exacerbated by the fact that it was spammend to our abuse account. Their /24 just fell off of my piece of the internet. Have I just been blind to this all along, or are the spammers getting bolder?
the spammers have nothing to fear from you, or us, or me, or anybody. with the incredible number of bottomfeeders and antivirus companies polluting the econsystem with their own various get-rich-quick schemes, there's no way to tell the difference between good and bad traffic, good and bad intent, good and bad providers, etc. the spam/antispam battleground is all just mud now. -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- Unbelievable Spam. Ejay Hire (Feb 02)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Jeff Shultz (Feb 02)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Richard Welty (Feb 02)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Roland Perry (Feb 02)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Paul Vixie (Feb 02)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Vadim Antonov (Feb 02)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Brian Bruns (Feb 02)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Vadim Antonov (Feb 02)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Bill Thompson (Feb 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Michael . Dillon (Feb 03)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Alexei Roudnev (Feb 03)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. vijay gill (Feb 03)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Alexander Bochmann (Feb 03)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Tom (UnitedLayer) (Feb 03)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 03)
(Thread continues...)