nanog mailing list archives

Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello skynet.be ?)

From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 09:02:01 -0500

On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 08:42:53 EST, jlewis () lewis org said:

But this really doesn't seem to be NANOG material.  Try spam-l or 
spamtools.


When the traffic blip caused by the A/V tools is bigger than the
traffic blip caused by the actual virus, it's an operational issue.

Attachment: _bin
Description:

Current thread:

other virus damages/costs.....(hello skynet.be ?) Mike Tancsa (Feb 02)
- Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello skynet.be ?) Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 02)
- Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello skynet.be ?) jlewis (Feb 02)
  - Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello skynet.be ?) Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 02)
  - Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello skynet.be ?) Matthew Sullivan (Feb 02)
- Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello skynet.be ?) Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 02)
- Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello skynet.be ?) Randy Bush (Feb 02)
  - Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello skynet.be ?) Todd Vierling (Feb 02)