nanog mailing list archives
Re: question on ptr rr
From: Daniel Senie <dts () senie com>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 11:49:33 -0500
At 08:40 AM 2/9/2004, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Michael.Dillon () radianz com writes: > We need to add email sending capability to both POP > and IMAP so that eventually we can all block port 25 > entirely from broadband/dialup edges. What's wrong with port 587 (rfc 2476 sec. 3.1) and requiring SMTP AUTH (rfc 2554), as people have widely deployed today? The problem is education; the technology is already widely available and deployed.
It'd be really nice is mail client programs had an easy way for users to configure these settings. We have to walk our clients through the advanced settings in Outlook Express, Eudora, and other programs often.
Current thread:
- Re: question on ptr rr, (continued)
- Re: question on ptr rr Paul Vixie (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Andrew - Supernews (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr garrett.allen (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Chris Adams (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Andrew - Supernews (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Lou Katz (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Niels Bakker (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Daniel Senie (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Randy Bush (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Arnold Nipper (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Paul Vixie (Feb 09)
- Re: question on ptr rr Paul Vixie (Feb 09)