nanog mailing list archives

Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core networks?


From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 13:59:39 -0500


On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 04:39:09PM -0200, Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote:

Even hardware with good IPv6 performance seems to forward at half
the
rate
of IPv4/MPLS packets;

we call that crappy hardware

Based on such point of view, non-crappy hardware would be: (blank) and
crappy hardware would be (blank), could you fill the blanks ?

As with so many other situations, the blanks can be filled in with
"Juniper" and "Cisco", in that order.

I don't get why Juniper and Cisco trie-lookup forwarding would differ in
comparing IPv4 and IPv6; Juniper does a 8+1+1+1+1+... search until a leaf
node is found, while Cisco does 16+8+8 (or something near it but still with
3 phases); for both architetures, IPv6 longer addresses implies walking more
deeply into the tree in order to find where to route.

Uhh...... One trie lookup is fully supported in ASIC, the other is not.

Just to be sure, my point here is not where the effective IPv6 performance
suits one needs or not, but wether a router that can forward <amount> Mpps
of IPv4/MPLS packets can also forward the same amount of IPv6 packets per
second.

Personally I'd say the routing protocol functionality and stability is as
important if not more important. I don't see the point in implementing a
v6 network consisting of seperate 7206vxrs (to contain the ios crashes)  
and tunnels, if you're going to bother with it at least do it native and
do it right.

-- 
Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>       http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)


Current thread: