nanog mailing list archives

Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses


From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 19:13:12 +0000 (GMT)


Why large MTU then? Most modern ethernet controllers don´t care if you´re
sending 1500 or 9000 byte packets. (with proper drivers taking advantage of
the features there) If you´re paying for 40 byte packets anyway, there is no
incentive to ever go beyond 1500 byte MTU.

I think its partially due to removal of overhead and improvements you get out of 
TCP (bearing in mind it uses windowing and slow start)

Bit of data on this link that i googled up, 

http://www-iepm.slac.stanford.edu/monitoring/bulk/10ge/20030303/tests.html


Current thread: