nanog mailing list archives
Re: Smallest Transit MTU
From: Daniel Hagerty <hag () linnaean org>
Date: 29 Dec 2004 18:27:49 -0500
Joe Abley <jabley () isc org> writes:
On 29 Dec 2004, at 16:33, Tony Rall wrote:But that only affects tcp traffic - it does nothing to help other protocols.Are there any common examples of the DF bit being set on non-TCP packets?
It's not unheard of for tunelling technologies to run PMTU across the bearer network to dynamically adjust the MTU of the tunnel. I think cisco supports it at least.
Current thread:
- Smallest Transit MTU Jerry Pasker (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Joe Abley (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Fred Baker (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Jerry Pasker (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Fred Baker (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Tony Rall (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Joe Abley (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Daniel Hagerty (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Alex Bligh (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Joe Abley (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Tony Rall (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Joe Abley (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Joe Abley (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Edward B. Dreger (Dec 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Dan Hollis (Dec 29)