nanog mailing list archives
Re: verizon.net and other email grief
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 20:52:46 +0100
On 16-dec-04, at 19:33, just me wrote:
The great thing about teh internat is that differing solutions to common problems are embraced.
Better solutions reap their rewards, and generally survive.
I wonder how many folks perpetually arguing this point have ever actually implemented anycasted DNS service?
In any case, I cry uncle. Can we just agree to disagree?
No, we can't.Reasonable people can and disagree on how much anycasting is exactly right. This is somewhat important, as there is a tradeoff between normal case performance and the likeliness of certain exceptional failure modes.
However, having two IP addresses that are authoritative for a TLD and then heavily anycasting those is just plain wrong because these failure modes aren't very exceptional any more this way. This would be easily fixed by adding more authoritative addresses and making their anycasting different from the other addresses.
Having just two addresses is the main problem, the fact that they're also anycast just makes it even worse under certain circumstances.
Current thread:
- Re: verizon.net and other email grief, (continued)
- Re: verizon.net and other email grief Jeffrey I. Schiller (Dec 10)
- Re: verizon.net and other email grief Rich Kulawiec (Dec 12)
- Re: verizon.net and other email grief Simon Waters (Dec 13)
- Re: verizon.net and other email grief Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 13)
- Anycast reliability (was: Re: verizon.net and other email grief) Steve Gibbard (Dec 13)
- Re: Anycast reliability (was: Re: verizon.net and other email grief) Joe Abley (Dec 13)
- Re: verizon.net and other email grief Todd Vierling (Dec 14)
- Re: verizon.net and other email grief Daniel Karrenberg (Dec 16)
- Re: verizon.net and other email grief Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 16)
- Re: verizon.net and other email grief just me (Dec 16)
- Re: verizon.net and other email grief Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 16)
- Re: verizon.net and other email grief Steve Gibbard (Dec 16)
- Re: verizon.net and other email grief Joe Maimon (Dec 16)
- Re: verizon.net and other email grief Bill Woodcock (Dec 16)
- Dampening considered harmful? (Was: Re: verizon.net and other email grief) Jared Mauch (Dec 16)
- Re: Dampening considered harmful? (Was: Re: verizon.net and other email grief) Jerry Pasker (Dec 16)
- Re: Dampening considered harmful? (Was: Re: verizon.net and other email grief) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 16)
- Re: Dampening considered harmful? (Was: Re: verizon.net and other email grief) Jared Mauch (Dec 16)
- Re: Dampening considered harmful? (Was: Re: verizon.net and other email grief) Jared Mauch (Dec 16)
- Re: Dampening considered harmful? (Was: Re: verizon.net and other email grief) Yakov Rekhter (Dec 20)
- Re: verizon.net and other email grief Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 16)