nanog mailing list archives
Re: Banned on NANOG
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan () verisign com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:04:44 -0500
You expect? Bill, nothing personal, but your S:N is 0:6 at this point. Not one single op post ever. No meeting attendance. Not one answered technical question. How about earning a few stripes before making demands of NANOG? Srh may be in need of a config change, but she's one of us. Show some respect. /plonk -M --- Martin Hannigan hannigan () verisign com Verisign, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu <owner-nanog () merit edu> To: J.D. Falk <jdfalk () cybernothing org> CC: my network has a second name, it's n-a-n-o-g <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Sun Dec 05 00:09:58 2004 Subject: Re: Banned on NANOG On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, J.D. Falk wrote:
On 12/04/04, Patrick W Gilmore <patrick () ianai net> wrote:I also think that makes it nearly impossible to run a good, informative list. Certainly FAR more difficult than just leaving the list completely unmoderated. I do not believe anyone here would argue those points either (besides, obviously, the moderator herself)....who has been silent during this whole debate, which only serves to feed the flames (and the flamers) as we all make wild guesses regarding motive and intent.
My last email contained an explicit request for a responst. I expect to see one. - billn
Current thread:
- Banned on NANOG nanog gonan (Dec 02)
- Re: Banned on NANOG Blaxthos (Dec 02)
- Re: Banned on NANOG Paul Vixie (Dec 02)
- [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG Daniel Golding (Dec 02)
- Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG Paul Vixie (Dec 02)
- [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG Bill Woodcock (Dec 02)
- [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG Daniel Golding (Dec 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Banned on NANOG Hannigan, Martin (Dec 06)
- Re: Banned on NANOG Bill Nash (Dec 06)