nanog mailing list archives
Re: Reporting the state of an apparatus to a remote computer patented
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () anime net>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Scott Whyte wrote:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,757,714.WKU.&OS=PN/6,757,714&RS=PN/6,757,714
Would avoiding use of XML be enough to circumvent this? -Dan
Current thread:
- Reporting the state of an apparatus to a remote computer patented Scott Whyte (Aug 04)
- Re: Reporting the state of an apparatus to a remote computer patented Dan Hollis (Aug 04)
- Re: Reporting the state of an apparatus to a remote computer patented Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Aug 04)
- Re: Reporting the state of an apparatus to a remote computer patented Lucy E. Lynch (Aug 04)
- Re: Reporting the state of an apparatus to a remote computer patented Eric Kimminau (Aug 05)
- Re: Reporting the state of an apparatus to a remote computer patented William Allen Simpson (Aug 05)
- Re: Reporting the state of an apparatus to a remote computer patented David Lesher (Aug 05)
- Re: Reporting the state of an apparatus to a remote computer patented Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Aug 04)
- Re: Reporting the state of an apparatus to a remote computer patented Dan Hollis (Aug 04)
- Re: Reporting the state of an apparatus to a remote computer patented Niels Bakker (Aug 05)
- Re: Reporting the state of an apparatus to a remote computer patented Edward B. Dreger (Aug 06)