nanog mailing list archives
Re: Quick question.
From: Tony Li <tony.li () tony li>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 02:02:29 -0700
On Aug 4, 2004, at 10:53 PM, Paul Jakma wrote:
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Alexei Roudnev wrote:I am sorry, but I do not make a theory - I just repors practical results. 2 CPU systems are much more stable than 1 CPU system, in my experience. You are free to find an explanatiion, if you want -:).The theory suggests your experience is unusual,
Practice suggests that there may well be good reason for this. Mainboards that are set up for 2 CPUs are likely to be engineered to a much higher standard than your normal chop-shop cheapie special. An interesting experiment would be to run a 1 CPU system based on the exact same 2 CPU mainboard and if it the level of reliability
would be significantly different. Tony
Current thread:
- Re: Quick question., (continued)
- Re: Quick question. Alexei Roudnev (Jul 31)
- Re: Quick question. Alexei Roudnev (Jul 31)
- RE: Quick question. Paul Jakma (Aug 01)
- Re: Quick question. Alexei Roudnev (Aug 03)
- Re: Quick question. Paul Jakma (Aug 03)
- Re: Quick question. Paul G (Aug 03)
- Re: Quick question. Paul Jakma (Aug 04)
- Re: Quick question. Paul G (Aug 04)
- Re: Quick question. Alexei Roudnev (Aug 04)
- Re: Quick question. Paul Jakma (Aug 04)
- Re: Quick question. Tony Li (Aug 05)
- Re: Quick question. Alexei Roudnev (Aug 03)
- Re: Quick question. Alexei Roudnev (Aug 04)
- Re: Quick question. Adrian Chadd (Aug 04)
- Re: Quick question. Alexei Roudnev (Aug 04)
- Re: Quick question. Alexei Roudnev (Jul 31)
- RE: Quick question. Erik Bais (Aug 01)
- Re: Quick question. Joshua Brady (Aug 01)
- Re: Quick question. Alexei Roudnev (Aug 03)
- Re: Quick question. Alexei Roudnev (Aug 03)