nanog mailing list archives
Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama)
From: Patrick W.Gilmore <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:46:38 -0400
On Apr 21, 2004, at 3:14 PM, Paul Jakma wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Patrick W.Gilmore wrote:
try not to include text after your sig. some people set their mailers to strip sigs from replies.
Wasn't that important. [...]
Which is only 28 hours at 10kpps:
1042284544/(10*1000)/3600 = 28.95234
bit less likely admittedly.
From my original post: "at 10K pps it would still take ~29 hours on average". (I consider "28.95" closer to 29 than 28, but that's me.)
So I would say we are in agreement. Thanx for checking my math. -- TTFN, patrick P.S. It is really nice for everyone to keep agreeing with me. :)
Current thread:
- Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama), (continued)
- Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) Paul Vixie (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) E.B. Dreger (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) Peter Galbavy (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) E.B. Dreger (Apr 21)
- Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) Crist Clark (Apr 21)
- Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 21)