nanog mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT)
From: "Dr. Jeffrey Race" <jrace () attglobal net>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 09:10:32 -0400
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 06:12:16 -0400, Chris Brenton wrote:
An uneducated end user is not something you can fix with a service pack.
A profound point, again highlighting the fact that there are no technical solutions to this problem. (Though technical measures to enhance traceability are a big help.) So, the logical inference is training and licensing to get internet access. When I was 16 in Connecticut many many years ago, we had to take a driver-training course (given by a policeman) to get a driver's license. I see no discussion about this approach, here or elsewhere. Jeffrey Race
Current thread:
- RE: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Michel Py (Apr 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Dr. Jeffrey Race (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Gregh (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Brian Russo (Apr 19)
- RE: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Vivien M. (Apr 19)
- RE: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) David Schwartz (Apr 19)
- RE: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Vivien M. (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Gregh (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Scott Weeks (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Gregh (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) John Neiberger (Apr 19)
- RE: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Drew Weaver (Apr 19)