nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lazy network operators
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 18:44:05 +0200
On the other hand, we've had DDoS prevention mechanisms (based on multiple rate-limiters, for different kinds of packets) deployed for over 6 months now. They seem to work just fine, are always active, and require no state in the network.
* paul () vix com (Paul Vixie) [Fri 16 Apr 2004, 17:14 CEST]:
you know how to rate-limit without state in the network? please explain.
Unlike PNAT, you don't need to look at packets traveling both ways. This is a plus, I suppose. -- Niels.
Current thread:
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT, (continued)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Sean Donelan (Apr 19)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Matt Hess (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Alexei Roudnev (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators Michael . Dillon (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Joel Jaeggli (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 15)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 15)
- Re: Lazy network operators Pekka Savola (Apr 16)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 16)
- Re: Lazy network operators Niels Bakker (Apr 16)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 16)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 16)
- Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 16)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 16)
- Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 16)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Jakma (Apr 17)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 17)
- Re: Lazy network operators Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Apr 20)