nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spam with no purpose?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 07:45:48 -0800
for those who tire of the increasing complexity of email(*) may I recommend /usr/ucb/mail - a (relatively) small, lightweight MUA.
real hackers read their mail with cat -- from some sig back in the '80s
Current thread:
- Spam with no purpose? Deepak Jain (Mar 31)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Richard Welty (Mar 31)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Adrian Chadd (Mar 31)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 31)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Jerry Eyers (Apr 01)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Randy Bush (Apr 01)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? bmanning (Apr 01)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Randy Bush (Apr 01)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Apr 01)
- Re: Mail with no purpose? Richard Cox (Apr 01)
- Re: Mail with no purpose? william(at)elan.net (Apr 01)
- Re: Mail with no purpose? Eric A. Hall (Apr 01)
- Re: Mail with no purpose? william(at)elan.net (Apr 01)
- Re: Mail with no purpose? Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Apr 01)
- Re: Mail with no purpose? Richard Cox (Apr 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Gregory Hicks (Mar 31)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Mar 31)