nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 16:43:56 -0400
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 13:17:53 PDT, Dan Hollis said:
this implies network operators will suddenly find a clue, something which will never happen. ever.
Death of the Internet Predicted. Film at 11. Note that *no* anti-spam solution will work unless the network operators have enough clue to deploy it, be it rate limiting, extensions to SMTP, a replacement for SMTP, or what have you. The only reason network operators don't have clues is because there's been little to no evolutionary pressure to acquire same. At some point, there *will* have to be a weeding out....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions?, (continued)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Joel Jaeggli (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Michael . Dillon (Apr 07)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Erik Haagsman (Apr 07)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Dave Howe (Apr 07)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Erik Haagsman (Apr 07)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Dan Hollis (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Petri Helenius (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Dan Hollis (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Petri Helenius (Apr 06)