nanog mailing list archives
Re: MLPPP Follow Up - How we fixed the problem
From: "Mark E. Mallett" <mem () mv mv com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:05:51 -0500
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 01:45:47PM -0800, Bruce Robertson wrote:
FWIW I have also observed that it is necessary to specify the interface when doing per-packet load balancing across multiple PVCs,Hmmmm... we're not having this trouble. What are you using to propagate your loopback interfaces? It works just fine with OSPF.
Probably apples/oranges. We're not talking OSPF with our customer DSL boxes; the routing entries (as with the original poster, I believe) are static. Or maybe I am misunderstanding you. mm
Current thread:
- Re: MLPPP Follow Up - How we fixed the problem Mark E. Mallett (Mar 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: MLPPP Follow Up - How we fixed the problem jlewis (Mar 31)
- RE: MLPPP Follow Up - How we fixed the problem jlewis (Apr 01)