nanog mailing list archives
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated
From: Dave Stewart <dbs () dbscom com>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 14:16:34 -0400
At 02:01 PM 9/20/2003, Matt Larson wrote:
In response to this feedback, we have deployed an alternate SMTP implementation using Postfix that should address many of the concerns we've heard. Like snubby, this server rejects any mail sent to it (by returning 550 in response to any number of RCPT TO commands).
ICANN has requested that Verisign remove the wildcards in .com and .net. So what you're basically saying here is: that ain't gonna happen. Correct?
Current thread:
- VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Matt Larson (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Dave Stewart (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated bert hubert (Sep 20)
- RE: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Matthew Kaufman (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated neal rauhauser (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated ken emery (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Petri Helenius (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated neal rauhauser (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated ken emery (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Niels Bakker (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Declan McCullagh (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Matthew Sullivan (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated bdragon (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Dave Stewart (Sep 20)