nanog mailing list archives

Re: Worst design decisions?


From: Justin Shore <listuser () numbnuts net>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:19:20 -0500 (CDT)


On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, David Barak wrote:



--- Matt <acheron () qwest net> wrote:
I've got a couple others in my head from 3Com and a
couple of others, 
but I thought I'd get the ball rolling.  So, what do
you think?


Personally my issues are console-cable related: is
there a benefit to the HUGE variety of console pinouts
used by the various hardware vendors?  Just look at
vendor C as an example (I can think of four types
immediately) - not only are the types of console port
not standardized, but process for determining the
location of the port clearly involved the reading of
entrails...

<Applause>

I can think of 6 different console cable pinouts and connectors that 
Enterasys (Cabletron) has used over the years.  No wait, make that 7.  How 
could I forget the inherited Fore ATM architecture and subsequent blades.  
Could people just pick ONE pinout and connector and stick with it?  
Please!  Of course I also have a Cisco 675 that I've been unable to use 
for years simply because I have yet to figure out what ungodly pinout 
Cisco used in it.

Justin


Current thread: