Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign

[Rachael Treu <rara () navigo com>]

So...what, if anything, has been heard along the lines 
of feedback/defense/repartee/retort/explanation/spin 
doctoring/screams of terror from Verisign under the 
crushing weight of this solid ochlocratic beatdown?

Given the below, was wondering if anyone, conversely, 
has heard any ardent professions on Verisign's part of 
commercial or vendor agnosticism or assurances of this 
being "for our own good?"

(Aside from the "Terms of Use" rhetoric on the sitefinder 
page, that is...)

Honesty is the best policy, but insanity tends to be a 
better defense.  (Not sure where commercial motivation 
falls in that regard...)

--ra

-- 
K. Rachael Treu, CISSP     rara at navigo dot com
..sic itur ad nauseum..

On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 10:05:04PM +0000, E.B. Dreger said something to the effect of:
> PH> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 00:50:18 +0300
> PH> From: Petri Helenius
>
>
> PH> If I remember correctly, Verisign person stated in an
> PH> interview that they estimate that it will be worth up to
> PH> $100M annually.
>
> I'm willing to suffer that sort of burden to, uh, help make the
> Internet a better place.  Where do I sign up?
>
>
> Eddy
> --
> Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
> Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
> Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
> Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
> _________________________________________________________________
>           DO NOT send mail to the following addresses :
>   blacklist () brics com -or- alfra () intc net -or- curbjmp () intc net
> Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.