Re: BIND 9 (Re: ISC Patches)

[Len Sassaman <rabbi () quickie net>]

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Paul Vixie wrote:

> it's under consideration now.  bind8 is not a priority for the bind forum,
> and isc would rather put it in feature-freeze, but we're looking into it.
> bind9's internals make "delegation-only" easy to implement.  bind8's
> internals are pretty twisty.

This would certainly be appreciated. I have my BIND 8 name servers patched
with a modified version of this:

http://sam.zoy.org/writings/internet/verisign/patch-bind-8.4.1.0-dickhead.diff

... but it certainly isn't as clean as I'd like.


--Len.