nanog mailing list archives
Re: new openssh issue
From: Avleen Vig <lists-nanog () silverwraith com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:26:57 -0700
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 03:50:04PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
A posting to full-disclosure quotes Theo as saying HP and Cisco are affected, and I don't see any reason that Juniper would *NOT* be, given the common code base of the OpenSSH implementations. I'm not going to say the routers are vulnerable, but I *would* say that ACLs blocking port 22 to the router might be a good idea.....
Isn't this a common practice anyway? Has been anywhere sensible I've seen :-)
Current thread:
- new openssh issue Len Rose (Sep 16)
- Re: new openssh issue William Allen Simpson (Sep 16)
- Re: new openssh issue Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 16)
- Re: new openssh issue Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 16)
- Re: new openssh issue Avleen Vig (Sep 17)
- Now a Sendmail issue as well (was Re: new openssh issue) Mike Tancsa (Sep 17)
- Re: new openssh issue up (Sep 17)
- Re: new openssh issue Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 16)
- Re: new openssh issue William Allen Simpson (Sep 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: new openssh issue Ingevaldson, Dan (ISS Atlanta) (Sep 16)
- RE: new openssh issue Ingevaldson, Dan (ISS Atlanta) (Sep 16)
- RE: new openssh issue Buhrmaster, Gary (Sep 17)