nanog mailing list archives
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?)
From: Paul Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 05:13:45 +0000
So, Verisign just returns a NS pointer to another name server Verisign controls which then answers the queries with Verisign's "helpful" web site. Half-life of the patch: 1 day?
i don't think so. verisign is on public record as saying that the reason they implemented the wildcard was to enhance the services offered to the internet's eyeball population, who has apparently been clamouring for this. in this story, for example... http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030916/ap_on_hi_te/internet_typos_4 ...it was thus spake: VeriSign spokesman Brian O'Shaughnessy said Tuesday that individual service providers were free to configure their systems so customers would bypass Site Finder. But he questioned whether releasing a patch to do so would violate Internet standards. Vixie acknowledged that it could -- standards call for operators like VeriSign to have complete control over their directories -- but he said not releasing a patch would create greater chaos. therefore i believe that while they may have to change the A RR from time to time according to their transit contracts, verisign won't insert an NS RR into the sitefinder redirection. if they do, and if bind's user community still wants to avoid sitefinder, they can declare the second server "bogus", with no new code changes from isc. but that all seems terribly unlikely.
Current thread:
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?), (continued)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 16)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Damian Gerow (Sep 16)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Robert A. Hayden (Sep 16)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Ben Crosby (Sep 16)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Hank Nussbacher (Sep 16)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) David B Harris (Sep 16)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Dan Hollis (Sep 16)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Mike Lewinski (Sep 16)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Paul Vixie (Sep 16)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Sean Donelan (Sep 16)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Paul Vixie (Sep 16)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Sean Donelan (Sep 16)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) John Brown (Sep 16)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Vadim Antonov (Sep 17)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Paul Vixie (Sep 16)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Christopher X. Candreva (Sep 17)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) bert hubert (Sep 17)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Andy Dills (Sep 17)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Paul Vixie (Sep 17)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) E.B. Dreger (Sep 16)
- Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) william (Sep 16)