nanog mailing list archives
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior
From: dani-nanog () roisman com
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 21:11:12 -0700
A couple things come to mind -- 1) Does this increase the RAM needed on a caching resolver? I.e. does it take more RAM to cache the 15-minute positive reply, than an NXDOMAIN negative reply? 2) In the "bestpractices.pdf" file, it states the following: "A response server should be configured to return an indication that the provided services were reached as a result of wildcard processing when the server returns a response to connection requests sent by end user applications." Can Verisign explain how the following transaction is consistent with the above guideline (where is the indication of wildcard processing): $ telnet mx.no-suchdomain-yadda-yadda.com 25 Trying 64.94.110.11... Connected to mx.no-suchdomain-yadda-yadda.com. Escape character is '^]'. 220 snubby4-wceast Snubby Mail Rejector Daemon v1.3 ready helo example.com 250 OK mail from: nobody () example com 250 OK rcpt to: nobody () example com 550 User domain does not exist. Oh well -- here's to looking out for the BIND patch... - Dani
Current thread:
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior, (continued)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Joe Maimon (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior wayne (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Duane Wessels (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Hank Nussbacher (Sep 16)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior David B Harris (Sep 16)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Neil J. McRae (Sep 16)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior George William Herbert (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Simon Lyall (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Dr. Jeffrey Race (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior dani-nanog (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior George William Herbert (Sep 16)