nanog mailing list archives
RE: What *are* they smoking?
From: Johnny Eriksson <bygg () cafax se>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 2:27:22 WET DST
"Jeroen Massar" <jeroen () unfix org> wrote:
Any kiddie group already planning to "take down" the advert server ? It's just 1 IP to take out a *lot* of domains, anything you can mistype ;) "Look mommy we took down <think up something>.net, now you see it now you..."
idea for next virus: after reproducing itself, construct a random domain name ending in .net and ddos it at a low rate for a day or so. if the faked up domain is someones real one, you get a small number of packets to that domain. if a large number of domains resolve to the same ip, well, too bad for that ip... that might even be a virus a lot of people want to run. --Johnny
Current thread:
- Re: public resolver, (continued)
- Re: public resolver Doron Shikmoni (Sep 17)
- Re: public resolver (was: bind patch? (Re: What *are* they smoking?)) Paul Vixie (Sep 17)
- Re: public resolver (was: bind patch? (Re: What *are* they smoking?)) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 18)
- Patching BIND (Re: What *are* they smoking?) E.B. Dreger (Sep 15)
- Re: Patching BIND (Re: What *are* they smoking?) John Brown (Sep 15)
- Re: Patching BIND (Re: What *are* they smoking?) E.B. Dreger (Sep 15)
- Re: certified idiots Petri Helenius (Sep 15)
- Many single letter.com/net reserved by IANA now Verisign michael (Sep 15)
- Re: What *are* they smoking? william (Sep 15)
- RE: What *are* they smoking? Tomas Lund (Sep 15)
- Re: What *are* they smoking? Karsten W. Rohrbach (Sep 16)
- Re: What *are* they smoking? Aaron Hopkins (Sep 16)
- Re: What *are* they smoking? Ben Browning (Sep 16)