Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings

[Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>]

Brandon Butterworth wrote:

> > the it behaves well in varying network conditions, which cannot be said 
> > from either WM or RM.
> >    
>
> Quality of the link from encoder to Real server is important, send
> garbage to the server and it has nothing to distribute.
>
>  
One can screw it up earlier than that, send garbage to the encoder and 
it spends 90%
of the available bandwidth encoding noise.

> I get the impression it's done in band with other NANOG traffic and may
> be suffering against the warez traffic.
>
>  
Diffserv anyone?

Pete