nanog mailing list archives
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated
From: Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 12:18:32 +0200
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:08:27AM +0000, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
What if you change the behaviour of the GTLD named daemons to return an NXDOMAIN response to any MX queries on non-existent domains, you will then take this whole debate on SMTP out of the equation ...
MTAs fall back to the A RR if there are no MX RRs for a given recipient domain. Regards, Daniel
Current thread:
- Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal, (continued)
- Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Robert Blayzor (Sep 20)
- Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Paul Vixie (Sep 20)
- Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Henry Linneweh (Sep 20)
- Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Jared Mauch (Sep 21)
- Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Brian Bruns (Sep 20)
- Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Robert Blayzor (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Eric A. Hall (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Owen DeLong (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Daniel Roesen (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated E.B. Dreger (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Eric A. Hall (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Eric A. Hall (Sep 21)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Avleen Vig (Sep 20)
- Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated jlewis (Sep 21)