nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verisign vs ICANN
From: Kee Hinckley <nazgul () somewhere com>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 17:03:04 -0400
At 8:37 PM +0100 9/20/03, Simon Lockhart wrote:
Okay, to Internet "Experts", things are broken - their domain checking scripts no longer return "domain available" (why not just check whois.internic.net?).
To quote Verisign, although this is true of all other whois providers:
TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Never mind that there isn't a standard format for the returned information between providers.
The whois database is not a replacement for a DNS query. -- Kee Hinckley http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Spam Defense http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate everyone else's.
Current thread:
- Verisign vs ICANN Len Rose (Sep 20)
- Re: Verisign vs ICANN Simon Lockhart (Sep 20)
- Re: Verisign vs ICANN Len Rose (Sep 20)
- Re: Verisign vs ICANN Kee Hinckley (Sep 20)
- Re: Verisign vs ICANN E.B. Dreger (Sep 20)
- Re: Verisign vs ICANN Petri Helenius (Sep 21)
- Re: Verisign vs ICANN william (Sep 21)
- Re: Verisign vs ICANN Simon Lockhart (Sep 20)