nanog mailing list archives
Re: ix's & prefix registration
From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <suresh () outblaze com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 02:49:37 +0800
Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net> writes:
AMS-IX does not, nor does it require its members to peer with anybody (including the exchange-supporting network infrastructure). AMS-IX believes that the decision to peer is up to the individual members.
NIXI (http://www.nixi.org) - the national internet exchange of india - seems to enforce a mandatory multilateral peering policy (though their policy, and their setup, sure sounds like a godawful mess, right about now) :( Quoting from their membership agreement (a word doc at http://www.nixi.org/NIXI%20T&C_%20ver_%202.doc) -
Peering Policy of NIXI NIXI has adopted a Multilateral peering policy . Member ISPs shall not refuse to accept traffic from other members.
--srs
Current thread:
- ix's & prefix registration joshua sahala (Oct 14)
- Re: ix's & prefix registration bmanning (Oct 14)
- Re: ix's & prefix registration Bill Woodcock (Oct 14)
- Re: ix's & prefix registration Joe Abley (Oct 14)
- Re: ix's & prefix registration Nipper, Arnold (Oct 14)
- Re: ix's & prefix registration Jess Kitchen (Oct 14)
- Re: ix's & prefix registration Niels Bakker (Oct 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ix's & prefix registration Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 14)
- Re: ix's & prefix registration Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 15)