nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISPs' willingness to take action
From: "Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS" <billstewart () att com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 00:27:02 -0600
Brian Bruns asserts that there are lots of home users connecting to their office Exchange servers without VPNs, and that therefore blocking the Microsoft ports was bad. While I agree with his point that you shouldn't do it without documenting what you are or are not blocking, I'm really surprised to hear the assertion that people are leaving unfirewalled Exchange servers out on the net. Is this actually common? /shudders...
Current thread:
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action, (continued)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Sean Donelan (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action kenw (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Sean Donelan (Oct 27)
- ISPs' willingness to take action [OT USPS] David Lesher (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action [OT USPS] Henry Linneweh (Oct 27)
- RE: ISPs' willingness to take action Charles Sprickman (Oct 26)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action matt (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Niels Bakker (Oct 27)
- RE: ISPs' willingness to take action Bob German (Oct 27)
- RE: ISPs' willingness to take action Eric Kuhnke (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Alan Spicer (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action kenw (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action E.B. Dreger (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action kenw (Oct 27)