nanog mailing list archives

Re: WLAN shielding


From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 21:51:14 -0500 (EST)


On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, David Lesher wrote:
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
My company is investigating the use of wireless in a couple of our
conference rooms.  Aside from limiting the scope of reception with various
directional antennae, does anyone have any suggestions or pointers for
other ways to limit the propagation of signals (i.e. special shielding
paint, panels or other wall coatings)?

As I told Andy, you need a "RayProof" or similar brand shielded
conference room. This is Faraday Cage, with a tight-fighting door,
etc.

Uhm, dumb question.  If it is that important, why are you using
wireless at all?  Why not install a cheap switch/hub in the middle of the
conference table and let people plug a patch cord from the hub to their
laptops?


Stupid pen-test tricks, instead of using an expensive WiFi scanner and
cracking WEP; often you can collect better intelligence with a radio
turned to the frequency used by wireless lapel mics used by executives
during briefings.




Current thread: