nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anit-Virus help for all of us??????
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:10:15 -0500
In message <200311242043.hAOKhYKL003690 () turing-police cc vt edu>, Valdis.Kletni eks () vt edu writes:
Question: What speed access is needed to guarantee "mean time to download patches" is significantly less than "mean time to probed by packet-to-0wn" (significantly == 20x lower still gives a 5% chance of getting 0wned while patching)?
It's not just the download time, it's the install time. I recently upgraded a win2k box to winxp. Download was very fast -- my office has excellent connectivity. But the patch installation took so long that I had to disconnect the Ethernet cable so I could go home. --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
Current thread:
- Re: Re[2]: Anit-Virus help for all of us??????, (continued)
- Re: Re[2]: Anit-Virus help for all of us?????? Alexei Roudnev (Nov 24)
- Re: Anit-Virus help for all of us?????? Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 24)
- Re: Anit-Virus help for all of us?????? Gerardo Gregory (Nov 24)
- Re: Anit-Virus help for all of us?????? Scott Call (Nov 24)
- Re: Anit-Virus help for all of us?????? Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 24)
- Re: Anit-Virus help for all of us?????? Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 24)
- Re: Anit-Virus help for all of us?????? William Allen Simpson (Nov 24)
- Re: Anit-Virus help for all of us?????? Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 25)
- Re: Anit-Virus help for all of us?????? Sean M . Doran (Nov 25)
- Re: Anit-Virus help for all of us?????? Jeff Shultz (Nov 24)
- Re: Anit-Virus help for all of us?????? Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 24)