nanog mailing list archives
RE: Hijacked IP space.
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 07:51:53 -0800
Those options are not mutually exclusive, and, while I agree that it would be better if the RIR's accepted generic GPG keys along the lines of what RADB does, the X.509 certificate is not a bad first step. At least it's better than Mail-From or Crypt-PW.Should we, as a community, register with RIR's with PGP.Each of the RIRs has either already established, or is in the process of establishing, a CA for that purpose. Please use them.thanks, but i choose to have my peers certify my identity, not the rirs
the rirs already accept pgp certs. and i use them, as do all security-conscious registrants. i was disagreeing with woody's pushing x.509 certs to the exclusion of pgp certs. randy --- Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Current thread:
- Re: Hijacked IP space., (continued)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 04)
- RE: Hijacked IP space. McBurnett, Jim (Nov 04)
- RE: Hijacked IP space. Bill Woodcock (Nov 04)
- RE: Hijacked IP space. Randy Bush (Nov 04)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Joe Abley (Nov 04)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Brian Bruns (Nov 04)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Greg Maxwell (Nov 04)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Randy Bush (Nov 04)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Nipper, Arnold (Nov 04)
- RE: Hijacked IP space. Bill Woodcock (Nov 04)
- RE: Hijacked IP space. Owen DeLong (Nov 04)
- RE: Hijacked IP space. Randy Bush (Nov 04)
- RE: Hijacked IP space. Bill Woodcock (Nov 04)
- RE: Hijacked IP space. Randy Bush (Nov 04)
- RE: Hijacked IP space. Owen DeLong (Nov 04)
- OT - list netiquette JC Dill (Nov 04)
- Re: OT - list netiquette alex (Nov 04)
- Re: OT - list netiquette Jared Mauch (Nov 04)
- Re: OT - list netiquette Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 04)
- Re: OT - list netiquette Petri Helenius (Nov 04)
- Re: OT - list netiquette Mark E. Mallett (Nov 04)
- RE: Hijacked IP space. Larry J. Blunk (Nov 04)