nanog mailing list archives
Re: Hijacked IP space.
From: "Chris Lewis" <clewis () nortelnetworks com>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 16:47:44 -0500
James Cowie wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:17:38PM +0000, Andrew - Supernews wrote:
No announcement for that block has been visible here at any time in the past couple of weeks (specifically, since Oct 13). We might have missed it if it was never announced for more than a few minutes at a time, but it's _much_ more likely that the block was never announced and was merely forged into headers of a spam.
Our system reports that neither that prefix, nor any of its more-specifics, has been seen in the global routing tables at any moment since January 1st, 2002. [ http://www.renesys.com ]
We haven't seen anything from that block in our spamtrap either for at least a week.
The .224/24, on the other hand, it a real sewer.
Current thread:
- Hijacked IP space. chuck goolsbee (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Andrew - Supernews (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. James Cowie (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Chris Lewis (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Ray Wong (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Hank Nussbacher (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Ron da Silva (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Hank Nussbacher (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. E.B. Dreger (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Owen DeLong (Nov 04)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Hank Nussbacher (Nov 04)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Owen DeLong (Nov 04)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. william (Nov 04)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. James Cowie (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Andrew - Supernews (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Owen DeLong (Nov 04)