nanog mailing list archives

Re: [ifl.net #3657] Contact at: DNSRBL / Namesystems


From: Mark Vevers <mark () vevers net>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 17:18:09 +0100


Justin,

On Tuesday 27 May 2003 16:51, listuser () numbnuts net wrote:
I've checked all 3 MXs listed for vevers.net and none of them are listed
in any DNSBLs I can see, including dnsrbl.net.
I work for an ISP - we have a number of mail exchangers - my domain is not
on the affected server .... and the particular server (194.238.48.13) is
still listed.

I hate to ask the obvious but did you follow the instructions for removal
on this page?    http://www.dnsrbl.net/getremoved.html
Of course  ....  twice.  

Anyone on the list care to comment on the most effective way to get their
mailservers taken off unresponsive RBL's? (other than not let them be on there 
in the first place).  We think we know how this one happened but it would be
nice to know so that we can be sure we've plugged the hole - we were never
even informed that the server and had been listed in the first place - we
found out the hard way. I do think that RBL's operators ought to at least
respond to legitimate attempts to clear up issue.

Regards
Mark
-- 
Mark Vevers.  
Principal Internet Engineer, Internet for Learning,
Research Machines Plc  AS 5503
--
Legal Disclaimer:  Internet communications are not secure and
therefore RM does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this
message.  Any views or opinions presented are only those of the author and
not those of RM.  Please note that RM may intercept incoming and
outgoing e-mail communications.


Current thread: