nanog mailing list archives
Re: Another possibly hijacked block - 160.116.0.0/16
From: fingers <fingers () fingers co za>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 12:18:50 +0200 (SAST)
Hi I've spoken with Dr Duncan Martin, who currently administers Tenet. He didn't have any record of 160.116 being previously managed by Tenet (old Uninet in a way) but has forwarded your first post which I sent him to the gentleman who ran Uninet for many years before him. He said he'd let me know if he found anything out. Regards --Rob
Current thread:
- Another possibly hijacked block - 160.116.0.0/16 william (May 11)
- Re: Another possibly hijacked block - 160.116.0.0/16 william (May 11)
- Re: Another possibly hijacked block - 160.116.0.0/16 william (May 12)
- Re: Another possibly hijacked block - 160.116.0.0/16 fingers (May 12)
- Re: Another possibly hijacked block - 160.116.0.0/16 william (May 12)
- Re[2]: Another possibly hijacked block - 160.116.0.0/16 Richard Cox (May 13)
- Re[2]: Another possibly hijacked block - 160.116.0.0/16 william (May 13)
- Re: Another possibly hijacked block - 160.116.0.0/16 william (May 12)
- Re: Another possibly hijacked block - 160.116.0.0/16 william (May 11)
- Re: Another possibly hijacked block - 160.116.0.0/16 fingers (May 11)