nanog mailing list archives

RE: 69/8 was Re: Re[4]: The in-your-face hijacking example, was: Re: Who is announcing bogons?


From: Scott Granados <scott () wworks net>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 14:50:58 -0700 (PDT)


I'd like to Second that.

Having a list of unreachable networks is really helpful and it is getting
steadily better.  We haven't had issues now since December I believe which
is great.
Perhaps it was January but none in recent memory.


On Thu, 8 May 2003, Todd A. Blank wrote:

Hey Jon,

Things have really quieted down over here.  We have a good chunk of our
CIDR that comes from 69/8 deployed and get very few complaints lately.
Thanks for all the help and for your efforts on regarding issue.

Sincerely,

Todd A. Blank
CTO
IPOutlet LLC

-----Original Message-----
From: jlewis () lewis org [mailto:jlewis () lewis org]
Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2003 5:47 PM
To: Scott Granados
Cc: richard () mandarin com; nanog () merit edu
Subject: 69/8 was Re: Re[4]: The in-your-face hijacking example, was:
Re: Who is announcing bogons?


On Sat, 3 May 2003, Scott Granados wrote:

You may remove any 138.121.0.0/16 space transiting 26346 I just
removed it
all.

Atrivo is presently only transiting 69.1.78.0/24 via 26346 which is
space I
assigned him from my netblock.

I don't mean to hijack the thread, but as an early victim of 69/8 space,

are you still getting many complaints from customers about reachability
issues from that space?  According to

http://69box.atlantic.net/cgi-bin/bogon

there are still hundreds of networks with outdated bogon filters
blocking/ignoring 69/8.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis *jlewis () lewis org*|  I route
 System Administrator        |  therefore you are
 Atlantic Net                |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________





Current thread: