nanog mailing list archives

Re: Don't call registry off the map?

From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:43:24 -0400


In message <sefc0fbf.012 () gwsmtp ohsu edu>, "Tim Rand" writes:


I was able to earlier today, but the response was VERY slow.   Their =
server is probably pretty busy....


I got through to the Web site earlier, but I haven't received the 
confirmation emails.  I'm pretty certain there's no spam filter in the 
way, either -- I guess the mail server is even more overloaded than the 
Web server...

                --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
                http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)

Current thread:

Don't call registry off the map? Patrick (Jun 27)
- Re: Don't call registry off the map? Andy Dills (Jun 27)
  - Re: Don't call registry off the map? Andy Dills (Jun 27)
    - Re: Don't call registry off the map? Dominic J. Eidson (Jun 27)
    - Re: Don't call registry off the map? Chris Woodfield (Jun 27)
- Re: Don't call registry off the map? jlewis (Jun 27)
  - Re: Don't call registry off the map? Nick Nelson (Jun 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Don't call registry off the map? Tim Rand (Jun 27)
- Re: Don't call registry off the map? Steven M. Bellovin (Jun 27)
  - Re: Don't call registry off the map? Larry Rosenman (Jun 27)
  - Re: Don't call registry off the map? Sean Donelan (Jun 27)
- Re: Don't call registry off the map? Steven M. Bellovin (Jun 27)
- RE: Don't call registry off the map? Ejay Hire (Jun 30)
- RE: Don't call registry off the map? Callahan, Richard M, SOLGV (Jun 30)