nanog mailing list archives
Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd)
From: Paul Timmins <paul () timmins net>
Date: 18 Jun 2003 17:26:09 -0400
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 17:09, Jack Bates wrote:
The worst part of it is that spam is quickly becoming unreadable, so that legitimate emails that are readable are the emails more likely filtered. -Jack
On the upside, this means replacing the spam filter with a spell checker will move us toward 100% accuracy! :-) -Paul -- Paul Timmins paul () timmins net / http://www.timmins.net/ H: 313-586-9514 / C: 248-379-7826 / DC: 130*116*24495 AIM: noweb4u / Callsign: KC8QAY
Current thread:
- OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Miles Fidelman (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Jack Bates (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Petri Helenius (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Jack Bates (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Paul Timmins (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Petri Helenius (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) JC Dill (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Eric A. Hall (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) just me (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Curtis Maurand (Jun 19)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Andy Dills (Jun 19)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Jack Bates (Jun 19)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Andy Dills (Jun 19)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) just me (Jun 19)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) just me (Jun 19)