nanog mailing list archives
RE: IPv6
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () kotovnik com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 15:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
Well, since adding a simple option to IPv4 header would solve all address space problems w/o any need to change core routing infrastructure (unlike introduding v6) - I see little need to go for an entirely new L3 protocol. --vadim On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Deepak Jain wrote:
1) Is IPV4 approaching an addressing limitation? 2) Does IPV6 provide a significant buffer of new addresses (given current allocation policies) the way IPV4 did when it was new? If (1 & 2) => IPV6 is good If (1 | 2) => undefined If !(1 & 2) => who cares?
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 David Luyer (Jun 13)
- Re: IPv6 Petri Helenius (Jun 14)