RE: FW: Minimum prefix length?

["Temkin, David" <temkin () sig com>]

I'm glad to hear there is actually some precedent.  

As I mentioned to someone privately, I could go ahead and use a @yahoo.com
or some other webmail service, but I prefer doing anything work related via
email such as this "officially" rather than covertly.  I may go ahead and
switch at some point, though.

Ironic, though, that you're 100% correct- that signature is going to be
archived publically, which goes against what it claims.



-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen J. Wilcox [mailto:steve () telecomplete co uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:51 PM
To: Temkin, David
Cc: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: FW: Minimum prefix length?


Whilst we're sidetracking...

I took some counsel on this not so long ago to see whether these were just 
novelty signatures or if they were real legal stuff. Turns out they could 
actually be used legally, interesting I thought.

Howevers its curious that signatures such as this claiming to be
confidential 
are posted to a list which is very much public and archived in several
public 
websites.. not sure how right it is to autoappend them to all your mails as
well 
as the private ones!

Steve

On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Temkin, David wrote:

> Randy - please stop sending these to me - you send me one every time I 
> post to NANOG.  If you don't like the signature that's appended to my 
> emails (not by my choice), and the litigious society we live in,  go 
> ahead and block all email from me.
>
> Replies directly to you to stop sending me these emails have gone 
> unanswered, which is why I am mentioning this here.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy () psg com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:34 PM
> To: Temkin, David
> Subject: Re: Minimum prefix length?
>
>
> you have sent a message to me which seems to contain a legal warning 
> on who can read it, or how it may be distributed, or whether it may be 
> archived, etc.
>
> i do not accept such email, and have therefore deleted it.  do not 
> expect further response.
>
> randy
>
>
> IMPORTANT:The information contained in this email and/or its 
> attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, 
> please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete 
> this message and all its attachments.  Any review, use, reproduction, 
> disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an 
> unintended recipient is strictly prohibited.  Neither this message nor 
> any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, 
> solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other 
> financial instrument.  Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any 
> of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the 
> completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or 
> that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.



IMPORTANT:The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its
attachments.  Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of
this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly
prohibited.  Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or
should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or
sell any security or other financial instrument.  Neither the sender, his or
her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as
to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein
or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.