nanog mailing list archives
RE: Fast TCP?
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () att net il>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 07:31:10 +0200
At 11:41 PM 04-06-03 -0400, Deepak Jain wrote:
I am not sure why sending a single large/high speed stream today (>1Gb/s) is such an improvement over sending multiple today-streams of data, but I guess that is the difference between a get-it-done-right and a get-it-done-now mentality.
The bot-owners would tend to disagree. This will improve their kill ratio without having to significantly increase the size of their bot-herds. Now we can have someone be the receipent of some FAST-love.
-Hank
Current thread:
- Fast TCP? Mike Leber (Jun 04)
- Re: Fast TCP? Allan Liska (Jun 04)
- Re: Fast TCP? Marshall Eubanks (Jun 04)
- RE: Fast TCP? Deepak Jain (Jun 04)
- RE: Fast TCP? Hank Nussbacher (Jun 04)
- RE: Fast TCP? Rob Thomas (Jun 04)
- RE: Fast TCP? Deepak Jain (Jun 05)
- Re: Fast TCP? Mans Nilsson (Jun 04)
- Re: Fast TCP? E.B. Dreger (Jun 04)
- Re: Fast TCP? Scott Francis (Jun 05)
- Re: Fast TCP? Marshall Eubanks (Jun 04)
- Re: Fast TCP? Marshall Eubanks (Jun 05)
- Re: Fast TCP? Allan Liska (Jun 04)
- Re: Fast TCP? John Kristoff (Jun 05)